Study of the physical-chemical and sorption properties of SnO2 prepared by mechanochemical and microwave routes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp09.04.383
Abstract
There are many methods for synthesis of tin dioxide SnO2, namely sol-gel, precipitation. However, these methods do not allow to regulate the physical-chemical properties in wide limits in the synthesis stage. The most commonly obtained samples are predominantly microporous as a rule. On the other hand, the meso-macroporous structure is required for the effective use of tin dioxide in sorption processes. The mechanochemical and microwave treatments can be used for eliminating mentioned above disadvantages. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to study the influence of the mechanochemical and microwave treatments on the physical-chemical and sorption properties of SnO2 prepared by heterogeneous precipitation.
SnO2 gels and xerogels have been obtained by heterogeneous precipitation. The mechanochemical treatment was carried out in air and water at 300 rpm for 0.5 h in the form of dried xerogel as well as wet gel using a planetary ball mill Pulverisette-7. Initial wet gel was subjected to microwave treatment for 1 h using a high-pressure reactor «NANO 2000». We used XRD and DTA-TG analysis, FTIR spectroscopy, adsorption-desorption of nitrogen for characterization of initial and modified samples.
The initial sample corresponds to the composition tin oxohydroxide with gross formula Sn3O4(OH)4. For the modified samples a partial removal of the structural OH groups occurs. The initial sample is characterized by high values of specific surface area and high content of micropores. The specific surface area, total volume of pores, mesoporous size are increased as a result of the mechanochemical and microwave treatments. Formation of the secondary porosity that presented by meso- and macropores is peculiarity of xerogel milling in water.
The cation exchange capacity under the most optimal conditions for the sorption of U(VI) ions (pH = 5–6, no background, cationic forms of uranium) for the initial sample was 0.82 mEq/g UO22+. The mechanochemical and microwave treatments result in drastic increase in sorption capacity of tin oxohydroxide in relation to U(VI) ions. The greatest effect was observed for sample milled in the form of wet gel, the sorption capacity А of which increases almost in three times while distribution coefficient Kd increases almost 70 times. In case of sorption on the background of 0.1 M NaHCO3 (pH 8, model of block water of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant), the sorption capacity of sample after mechanochemical treatment of gel increases by 43 % compared to initial sample from 0.31 to 0.43 mEq/g UO22+. Thus, modified samples can remove both cationic and anionic forms of U(VI) ions in the solution. At the same time, for sorption of Cs(I) and Sr(II) ions, it has been found, that in both cases the mechanochemical and microwave treatments negatively affect to their removal in comparison with initial sample.
Keywords
References
1. Amphlett C.B. Inorganic Ion Exchangers. (Moscow: Mir, 1966). [in Russian].
2. Petro N.Sh., El-Naggar I.M., Shabana E.I., Misak N.Z. On the behaviour of hydrous tin oxide as an ion exchanger: structural features, porous texture, capacity and apparent pK values. Colloids Surf. 1990. 49: 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6622(90)80104-C
3. Nilchi A., Dehaghan T.Sh. Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamics for uranium and thorium ions adsorption from aqueous solutions by crystalline tin oxide nanoparticles. Desalination. 2013. 321: 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.06.022
4. White D.A., Rautiu R. The sorption of anionic species on hydrous tin dioxide. Chem. Eng. J. 1997. 66(2): 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(96)03163-4
5. Naushad Mu. Inorganic and composite ion exchange materials and their applications (Review). Ion Exchange Letters. 2009. 2: 1.
6. Coker E.N. Inorganic ion exchangers. Encyclopedia of separation science. (Cambridge:Academic Press, 2000).
7. Clearfield A. Inorganic ion-exchangers, past, present and future. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2000. 18(4): 655. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366290008934702
8. Zhang G., Liu M. Preparation of nanostructured tin oxide using a sol-gel process based on tin tetrachloride and ethylene glycol. J. Mater. Sci. 1999. 34(13): 3213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004685907751
9. Gavrilov V. Adsorption research of microporous structure of tin dioxide. Kinet. Catal. 2000. 41(2): 304. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771430
10. Buyanov R.A., Molchanov V.V., Boldyrev V.V. Mechanochemical activation as a tool of increasing catalytic activity. Catal. Today. 2009. 144(3–4): 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.02.042
11. Kersen U. The gas-sensing potential of nanocrystalline SnO2 produced by a mechanochemical milling via centrifugal action. Appl. Phys. A. 2002. 75(5): 559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003390101020
12. Sepelak V., Begin-Colin S., Caer G.L. Transformations in oxides induced by high-energy ballmilling. Dalton Transactions. 2012. 41: 11927. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2dt30349c
13. Tompsett G.A., Conner W.C., Engvesson K.S. Microwave synthesis of nanoporous materials. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2006. 7(2): 296. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200500449
14. Khalameida S.V., Samsonenko M.M., Skubiszewska-Zięba J., Zakutevskyy O.I., Kuznetsova L.S. Effect of mechanochemical modification on properties of powder tin (IV) oxide and oxohydroxide. Him. Fiz. Tehnol. Poverhni. 2017. 8(3): 271. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp08.03.271
15. Upor E., Mohaya M., Novak D. Photometric methods for determining the traces of inorganic substances. (Moscow: Mir, 1985). [in Russian].
16. Sokovykh E.V., Oleksenko L.P., Maksymovych N.P., Matushko I.P. Influence of temperature conditions of forming nanosized SnO2-based materials on hydrogen sensor properties. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015. 121(3): 1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4560-x
17. Ivanov VV, Sidorak I.A., Shubin AA, Denisova L.T. Preparation of SnO2 powders by decomposition of thermally unstable compounds. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies. 2010. 2(3): 189.
18. Krynitsyn A.P., Simanovskaya I.Ya., Strykhar O.L. Investigation of the interaction of water with structural and fuel-containing materials in the premises of the «Ukrytie» facility. Radiochemistry. 1998. 40(3): 279. [in Russian].
19. Kobets S.A., Pshinko G.N., Puzyrnaya L.N. Uranium (VI) in Natural Waters: Study of Occurrence Forms. J. Water Chem. Technol. 2012. 34(6): 277. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X12060057
20. Özero˘glu C., Keçeli G. Kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of U(VI) ions on densely crosslinked poly(methacrylic acid) from aqueous solutions. Radiochim. Acta. 2009. 97(12): 709.
21. Persson I. Hydrated metal ions in aqueous solution: How regular are their structures? Pure Appl. Chem. 2010. 82(10): 1901. https://doi.org/10.1351/PAC-CON-09-10-22
22. Marcus Y. Ionic radii in aqueous solutions. Chem. Rev. 1988. 88(8): 1475. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00090a003
23. Ismail A.F., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T. Gas Separation Membranes: Polymeric and Inorganic. (Cham: Springer, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01095-3
24. Yang J., Zhao Q., Xu H., Li L., Dong J., Li J. Adsorption of CO2, CH4, and N2 on gas diameter grade ion-exchange small pore zeolites. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2012. 57(12): 3701. https://doi.org/10.1021/je300940m
25. Zeng Y., Fan C., Do D.D., Nicholson D. Evaporation from an Ink-Bottle Pore: Mechanisms of adsorption and desorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014. 53(40): 15467. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie500215x
26. Boichinova E.S., Bondarenko T.S., Abovskaya N.V., Kolosova M.M. Sorption of anions and some organic peroxides by hydrated dioxides of zirconium, titanium and tin. Sorption and chromatographic processes. 2010. 10(2): 314. [in Russian].
27. Kostrikin A.V., Kosenkova O.V., Gorichev I.G., Spiridonov F.M., Komissarova L.N., Linko I.V., Pankratov D.V., Kostrikina L.P., Kuznetsova R.V., Zaitsev B.E. Surface complexes on the border of hydrated dioxides/water solutions with different pH levels. Vestnik TSTU. 2012. 18(1): 149. [in Russian].
28. Laskorin B.N., Karaseva T.A., Strelko V.V., Denisov V.I. About the reason for the selective sorption of heavy alkaline cations by ion exchangers such as zirconium phosphate. Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 1976. 229(4): 910. [in Russian].
29. Behrens E.A., Clearfield A. Titanium silicates, M3HTi4O4(SiO4)3•4H2O (M=Na+, K+),with three-dimensional tunnel structures for the selective removal of strontium and cesium from wastewater solutions. Microporous Mater. 1997. 11(1–2): 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-6513(97)00022-9
30. Oleksiienko O., Levchuk I., Sitarz M., Meleshevych S., Strelko V., Sillanpää M. Adsorption of caesium (Cs+) from aqueous solution by porous titanosilicate xerogels. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015. 57(12): 1.
31. Alby D., Charnay Cl., Heran M., Prelot B., Zajac J. Recent developments in nanostructured inorganic materials for sorption of cesium and strontium: synthesis and shaping, sorption capacity, mechanisms, and selectivity – a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018. 344: 511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.047
32. Al–Attar L., Dyer A., Blackburn R. Uptake of uranium on ETS–10 microporous titanosilicate. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Cnem. 2000. 246(2): 451. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006700808768
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp09.04.383
Copyright (©) 2018 M. M. Samsonenko, O. I. Zakutevskyy, S. V. Khalameida, J. Skubiszewska-Zięba, M. F. Kovtun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.